World Record Benchmark Performance

The powerful new Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2600 v4 product family offers unparalleled versatility across diverse data center workloads. These processors are designed for architecting next-generation data centers running on software-defined infrastructure and supercharged for efficiency, performance, and agility across cloud-native and traditional applications.

Optimal Workload Performance Meets Intelligent Orchestration for Your Modern Data Center

The Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2600 v4 product family is the right architectural foundation for software-defined enterprise data centers optimized for cloud deployments that require increased scalability, automation, and orchestration capabilities across compute, storage, and network workloads. Built-in features provide preferential allocation of resources based on priority workloads for better utilization overall and enable greater performance across cloud-native and traditional applications while maintaining service level agreements (SLAs). The digital services of tomorrow will require modern, programmable data centers optimized for agility, operational efficiency, and scale on demand. Architect that next-generation foundation today with software-defined infrastructure solutions built on the Intel Xeon processor E5-2600 v4 product family. 

  • Up to 47% higher generational performance on a financial services option pricing workload 
  • Up to 28% average performance improvement across a variety of key industry-standard workloads and applications
  • Up to 50% average energy efficiency (performance per watt) improvement across a variety of key industry-standard workloads and applications using improved components and newer, higher capacity SSDs 
  • Support up to 2.4x more VMs/server reducing operational expenses and cost per VM by up to 58% maximizing CSP profitability versus two-generations-old servers (E5 v2) 1

Platform Performance Highlights

Over 35 new world record performance benchmark results with the best Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2600 v4 product family-based platforms (as of November 10, 2016).

Partner

Platform

Segment - Benchmark

Importance

Cisco UCS* C220 M4 General Server Speed Computing:
SPECint*_base2006
2-socket world record

Partner

Platform

Segment - Benchmark

Importance

Dell PowerEdge* R730 Business Processing - Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP):
Two-tier SAP Sales and Distribution*
2-socket world record (Linux)

Partner

Platform

Segment - Benchmark

Importance

Fujitsu PRIMERGY* RX2540 M2 Business processing ERP/Energy Efficiency:
SAP Server Power (2-tier)*
World Record
Fujitsu PRIMERGY* RX2540 M2 Infrastructure/Virtualization:
VMmark* 2.5.2 Performance (matched pair)
2-socket world record
Fujitsu PRIMERGY* RX2540 M2 Infrastructure/Virtualization:
VMmark* 2.5.2 Performance with Server Power
World record

Partner Platform Segment - Benchmark Importance
HPE ProLiant* ML350 Gen9 Technical Speed Computing:
SPECfp*_base2006
2-socket x86 world record
HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 Big Data Analytics:
TPC Benchmark* H @ 1TB non-clustered
World record
HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 Big Data Analytics:
TPC Benchmark* Express Big Bench @ 3000
World record
HPE ProLiant* DL360 Gen9
HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9
HPE ProLiant* ML350 Gen9
Server-side Java*:
SPECjbb*2015 Distributed Max-jOPS
World record
HPE Synergy* 480 Gen9 Server-side Java:
SPECjbb*2015 Distributed Critical-jOPS
World record
HPE Synergy* 480 Gen9 Server-side Java:
SPECjbb*2015 Composite Max-jOPS
World record
HPE Synergy* 480 Gen9 Server-side Java:
SPECjbb*2015 Composite Critical-jOPS
World record
HPE ProLiant* DL360 Gen9
HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9

Server-side Java:
SPECjbb*2015 Multi-JVM Max-jOPS
2-socket world records 
  HPE ProLiant* DL360 Gen9 Server-side Java:
SPECjbb*2015 Multi-JVM Critical-jOPS
2-socket world record

Partner Platform Segment - Benchmark Importance
Fusion Server* RH2288H V3 General Server Energy Efficiency:
SPECpower_ssj*2008
World record

Partner Platform Segment - Benchmark Importance
Lenovo* System x3650 M5 Infrastructure/Virtualization:
SPECvirt_sc*2013
2-socket world record
Lenovo* System x3650 M5 Infrastructure/Virtualization:
SPECvirt_sc*2013_ServerPPW
2-socket world record
Lenovo* System x3650 M5 Infrastructure/Virtualization:
SPECvirt_sc*2013_PPW
2-socket world record
Lenovo* System x3650 M5 Business Processing:
TPC Benchmark* E
2-socket world record

Partner Platform Segment - Benchmark Importance
Oracle Server* X6-2 Business Processing:
SPECjEnterprise*2010
2-socket world record

Partner Platform Segment - Benchmark Importance
SGI ICE XA* IP-125 Technical Computing:
SPECmpiM*2007   
8-,16-,32-, and 40-node 2-socket world records
SGI Rackable* C2112-4GP3 Technical Computing:
SPECmpiM*2007
1-, 2-, and 4-node 2-socket world records
SGI ICE XA* IP-125 Technical Computing:
SPECmpiL*2007
32-, 64- and 128-node 2-socket world records
SGI Rackable* C2112-4GP3 Technical Computing:
SPECmpiL*2007
2-, 4-, 8-, and 16-node 2-socket world records

World Record Configurations

Results and configurations as of November 10, 2016

Cisco:
Claim based on best published two-socket SPECint*_base2006 result submitted to/published at https://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/ as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Cisco UCS* C220 M4 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (22 cores, 44 threads), Red Hat* Enterprise Linux* 7.2, Intel Compiler 16.0, Score: 73.1, source: http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/servers-unified-computing/specint-benchmark-disclosure.pdf.
 
Dell:
Claim based on best published two-socket Two-tier SAP SD* (Linux) with enhancement package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0 benchmark result submitted to/published at http://global.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/sd2tier.epx as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Dell PowerEdge* R730 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699A v4 on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux* Server 7.2 using SAP ASE* 16 scoring 22,222 SD benchmark users. Source: The SAP certification number is 2016050, http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7CC6FD292ABC44C5639F15B34E8F3FF2A0D31369DC5D7517E8.

Fujitsu:
Claim based on best published two-socket VMmark* 2.5.x performance (matched pair) result submitted to/published at https://www.vmware.com/a/vmmark/1/pair/1/ as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Fujitsu PRIMERGY* RX2530 M2 platform with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (22 cores, 44 threads), 512 GB memory, running VMware* ESXi 6.0.0 U2 Build 3620759 and vCenter Server 6.0.0 Build 3018524; Fibre Channel SAN storage. Score: 34.93 @ 28 Tiles, source: http://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/vmmark/2016-07-08-Fujitsu-RX2530M2.pdf.

Claim based on best published two-socket VMmark* 2.5.x performance with server power result submitted to/published at http://www.vmware.com/a/vmmark/2/ as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Fujitsu PRIMERGY* RX2540 M2 platform with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (22 cores, 44 threads), 512 GB memory, running VMware* ESXi 6.0.0 U1b Build 3380124 and vCenter Server 6.0.0 Build 3018524; Fibre Channel SAN storage. Score: PPKW Score: 38.3065 @ 28 Tiles, source: http://www.vmware.com/a/assets/vmmark/pdf/2016-03-31-Fujitsu-RX2540M2-serverPPKW.pdf.

Claim based on best published two-socket SAP* Server Power 2-tier result published at  http://global.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/Power_Benchmark_results.htm as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY RX2540 M2 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (2.2GHz, 22 cores), 512 GB memory, running Windows Server* 2012 R2 Standard Edition, SQL Server* 2012, SAP* enhancement package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0. Score: 4.27 watts/kSAPS. Source: The SAP certification number is 2016005, http://global.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/pdf/Cert2016005.pdf.

HPE:
Claim based on best published two-socket SPECfp*_base2006 result submitted to/published at https://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* ML350 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2667 v4 (3.2 GHz, 8 cores), with 256 GB (16 x 16 GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R) Total Memory on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 (x86_64), SP1, Kernel 3.12.49-11-default using C/C++: Version 16.0.0.101 of Intel C++ Studio XE, for Linux;, Fortran: Version 16.0.0.101 of Intel Fortran, Studio XE for Linux, Scoring 126. Data Source: http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2016q2/cpu2006-20160531-41726.html, Benchmark: SPECfp*_base2006.

Claim based on best published non-clustered TPC Benchmark* H @ 1TB result submitted to/published at www.tpc.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 on Microsoft* Windows Server* 2012 R2 Standard Edition using Microsoft SQL Server* 2016 Enterprise Edition scoring 678,492 QphH @ 1TB @ $0.64/QphH @ 1TB available 7/31/16, source: submitted to www.tpc.org/3320.

Claim based on best published TPC Benchmark* Express-BigBench @ 3000 result published at www.tpc.org as of 10 November. New configuration: 9x HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 & 3x DL360 Gen9 servers with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697A v4 for worker nodes on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 6.7 using Cloudera* Enterprise 5.6 scoring 337  BBQpm@3000 @ $1102.94/BBQpm@3000 available 3/31/16, source: submitted to www.tpc.org/3502.

Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Distributed result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* DL360 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (2.20GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 16GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R, on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 7.2 scoring 120674 SPECjbb*2015-Distributed max-jOPS, 39513 SPECjbb2015-Distributed critical-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q1/jbb2015-20160315-00054.html.

Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Distributed result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (2.20GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 16GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R, on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 7.2 scoring 120674 SPECjbb*2015-Distributed max-jOPS, 39615 SPECjbb2015-Distributed critical-jOPS. Source: https://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q1/jbb2015-20160315-00055.html.

Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Distributed result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* ML350 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (2.20GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 16GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R, on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 7.2 scoring 120674 SPECjbb*2015-Distributed max-jOPS, 38570 SPECjbb2015-Distributed critical-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q1/jbb2015-20160315-00056.html.

Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Distributed result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE Synergy 480 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (2.20GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 64 GB 4Rx4 PC4-2400T-LD, on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 7.2 scoring 67214 SPECjbb*2015-Distributed critical-jOPS, 94667 SPECjbb*2015-Distributed max-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00116.html.

Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Composite result submitted to/published at http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00116.html as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE Synergy 480 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (2.20GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 32 GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R, on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 7.2 scoring 106645 SPECjbb*2015-Composite max-jOPS, 59340 SPECjbb*2015-Composite critical-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00124.html.

Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Composite result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE Synergy 480 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 (2.20GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 32 GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R, on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP1 scoring 64452 SPECjbb*2015-Composite critical-jOPS, 104194 SPECjbb*2015-Composite max-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00122.html.

Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Multi-JVM result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* DL360 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699A v4 (2.40GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 16 GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R, on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP1 scoring 122045 SPECjbb*2015 Multi-JVM Max-jOPS, 29701 SPECjbb*2015-Multi-JVM Critical-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00119.html.

Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Multi-JVM result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699A v4 (2.40GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 16 GB 2Rx4 PC4-2400T-R, on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP1 scoring 122045 SPECjbb*2015 Multi-JVM Max-jOPS, 30318 SPECjbb*2015-Multi-JVM Critical-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00123.html.

Claim based on best published SPECjbb*2015-Multi-JVM result submitted to/published at www.spec.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: HPE ProLiant* DL360 Gen9 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699A v4 (2.40GHz, 22 cores/44 threads, 55MB cache), 16x 64 GB 4Rx4 PC4-2400T-L, on Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 7.2 scoring 74929 SPECjbb*2015 Multi-JVM Critical-jOPS, 97034 SPECjbb*2015-Multi-JVM Max-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00125.html.

Huawei:
Claim based on best published one-node SPECpower*_ssj2008 results, published at https://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Huawei Technologies Fusion Server RH2288H V3 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2698 v4, 64 GB memory, running Microsoft* Windows Server* 2012 R2 Datacenter, JVM version: Oracle Java HotSpot* 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.80-b11, mixed mode), version 1.7.0_80, Score: 12,212 overall ssj_ops/watt, source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2015/results/res2016q4/jbb2015-20161025-00125.html.

Lenovo:
Claim based on best-published two-socket SPECvirt_sc*2013 results published at https://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/ as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: 1-Node, 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 on Lenovo* System x3650 M5 with 512 GB total memory on Red Hat Enterprise Linux* 7.2-kernel 3.10.0-327. Source: http://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/res2016q3/virt_sc2013-20160823-00060-perf.html, Score: 2360 @ 137 VMs.

Claim based on best-published two-socket SPECvirt_sc*2013_ServerPPW results published at https://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/ as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: 1-Node, 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 on Lenovo* System x3650 M5 with 512 GB total memory on Red Hat Enterprise Linux* 7.2-kernel 3.10.0-327, using Yokogawa, Ltd WT310 power analyzer. Source: http://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/res2016q2/virt_sc2013-20160419-00049-ppws.html, Score: 4.196 @ 132 VMs.

Claim based on best-published two-socket SPECvirt_sc*2013_PPW results published at https://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/ as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: 1-Node, 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 on Lenovo* System x3650 M5 with 512 GB total memory on Red Hat Enterprise Linux* 7.2-kernel 3.10.0-327, using Yokogawa, Ltd WT310 power analyzer. Source: http://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/res2016q2/virt_sc2013-20160419-00049-ppw.html, Score: 4.196 @ 132 VMs.

Claim based on non-clustered best published two-socket TPC benchmark* E result submitted to/published at https://www.tpc.org as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Lenovo* System x*3650 M5 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 2.2GHz, (2 processor, 44 cores, 88 threads), 512GB DDR4, running Windows Server* 2012 SE, SQL Server* 2016 Enterprise Edition, 2x 900GB SAS (RAID-1), 4x 800GB SAS SSD (RAID-10), 53x 800GB SAS SSD. Availability: July 31, 2016. Source: www.tpc.org/4076. Score: 4,938.14 tpsE, at a price of $117.91 USD/tpsE.

Oracle:
Claim based on best published two-socket SPECjEnterprise*2010 result submitted to/published at https://www.spec.org/jEnterprise2010/results/jEnterprise2010.html as of 10 November 2016. New configuration: Oracle WebLogic Server Standard Edition Release 12.2.1 on Oracle Server* X6-2 with 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 on Oracle* Linux 6 Update 7 x86_64 using Oracle Java HotSpot* 64-Bit Server VM, version 1.8.0_91 scoring 27,803 EjOPS, source: https://www.spec.org/jEnterprise2010/results/res2016q1/jEnterprise2010-20160622-00061.html.

SGI:
Claim based on best 2-, 4-, 8-, 16-, 32-, 64-, and 128-node two-socket SPECmpiL*2007 benchmark results submitted to/published at https://www.spec.org/mpi2007/results as of 10 November 2016. New configurations: SGI Rackable C2112-4GP3 with 2-, 4-, 8-, and 16-node or SGI ICE XA servers with 32-, 64-, and 128-node 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-269x v4 using Intel Compiler 16, source: http://www.spec.org/mpi2007/results/.

Claim based on best 1, 2, 4, 8, 16-, 32-, and 40-node two-socket SPECmpiM*2007 benchmark results submitted to/published at https://www.spec.org/mpi2007/results as of 10 November 2016. New configurations: SGI Rackable C2112-4GP3 server with 1-, 2-, and 4-node 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v4 or SGI ICE XA server with 8-, 16-, 32-, and 40-node 2x Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2690 v4 using Intel® Compiler 16, source: http://www.spec.org/mpi2007/results/

Additional information: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Produkt- und Leistungsinformationen

1

(E5 v4 bis zu 2,4-mal mehr VMs/Server vs. Leistung von E5 v2 bei 58 % geringeren Kosten pro VM basierend auf SPECvirt_sc*2013-Workload für Virtualisierungsinfrastrukturkonsolidierung eingereicht/veröffentlicht unter https://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/, Stand: 16. März 2016); Vergleich: Einzelknoten, 2 x Intel® Xeon® Prozessor E5-2697 v2 auf IBM-System x*3650 M4* mit insgesamt 512 GB Arbeitsspeicher unter Red Hat Enterprise Linux* 6.4. Datenquelle: https://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/res2013q3/virt_sc2013-20130820-00004-perf.html, Ergebnis: 947 bei 53 VMs vs. Einzelknoten, 2 x Intel® Xeon® Prozessor E5-2699 v4 auf Lenovo-System x*3650 M5* mit insgesamt 512 GB Arbeitsspeicher unter Red Hat Enterprise Linux* 7. Datenquelle: eingereicht bei www.spec.org, Ergebnis: 2325 bei 132 VMs; höher = besser.  TCO-Analyse für 4-jährigen Zeitraum für 58 % geringere Kosten pro VM bei etwa gleicher Gesamtleistung/VM-Ebene:

a. Schätzungen für neues System: 10x 2 Intel® Xeon® Prozessoren E5-2699 v4 (Gesamtkosten für 4-jährigen Zeitraum 124.597 USD bei Unterstützung von 1320 VMs bei 94,39 USD/VM)

i. Serverwartung (2399 USD/Server) = 95.960 USD

ii. Energieversorgung und Kühlung (0,10 USD/KWh bei 60 % CPU-Auslastung) = 21.837 USD

iii. Rack-/Raumbedarf (155 USD/Server) = 6.200 USD

iv. Netzwerktechnik (15 USD/Server) = 600 USD

b. Schätzungen für bestehendes System: 25x 2 Intel® Xeon® Prozessoren E5-2697 v2 (Gesamtkosten für 4-jährigen Zeitraum 298.247 USD bei Unterstützung von 1325 VMs bei 225,09 USD/VM)

i. Serverwartung (2399 USD/Server) = 239.900 USD

ii. Energieversorgung und Kühlung (0,10 USD/KWh bei 60 % CPU-Auslastung) = 41.347 USD

iii. Rack-/Raumbedarf (155 USD/Server) = 15.500 USD

iv. Netzwerktechnik (15 USD/Server) = 1.500 USD [SRA1]

 

2

In Leistungstests verwendete Software und Workloads können speziell für die Leistungseigenschaften von Intel® Mikroprozessoren optimiert worden sein. Leistungstests, wie SYSmark und MobileMark, werden mit spezifischen Computersystemen, Komponenten, Softwareprogrammen, Operationen und Funktionen durchgeführt. Jede Veränderung bei einem dieser Faktoren kann andere Ergebnisse zur Folge haben. Als Unterstützung für eine umfassende Bewertung Ihrer vorgesehenen Anschaffung, auch im Hinblick auf die Leistung des betreffenden Produkts in Verbindung mit anderen Produkten, sollten Sie noch andere Informationen und Leistungstests heranziehen. Weitere Informationen siehe www.intel.com/benchmarks.

3

Intel hat keinen Einfluss auf und keine Aufsicht über die Entwicklung oder Implementierung von Benchmarktests oder Websites Dritter, auf die in diesem Dokument Bezug genommen wird. Intel empfiehlt seinen Kunden, die genannten Websites oder weitere Websites zu besuchen, auf denen über ähnliche Leistungsbenchmarks berichtet wird, um sich davon zu überzeugen, dass die angeführten Benchmarks zutreffen und sie die Leistung im Handel befindlicher Systeme wiedergeben.

4

Relative performance is calculated by assigning a baseline value of 1.0 to one benchmark result, and then dividing the actual benchmark result for the baseline platform into each of the specific benchmark results of each of the other platforms, and assigning them a relative performance number that correlates with the performance improvements reported.

5

Hinweise zur Optimierung: Unter Umständen können Intels Compiler bei Optimierungen, die nicht für Mikroprozessoren von Intel spezifisch sind, auch bei Mikroprozessoren anderer Hersteller denselben Optimierungsgrad erzielen. Zu diesen Optimierungen gehören Befehlssätze für Intel® Streaming SIMD Extensions 2 (Intel® SSE2), Intel® SSE3 und Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extensions 3 (SSSE3) sowie weitere Optimierungen. Intel übernimmt keine Garantie für die Verfügbarkeit, Funktionalität oder Effektivität von Optimierungen für Mikroprozessoren, die nicht von Intel hergestellt wurden. Mikroprozessor-abhängige Optimierungen in diesem Produkt sind für die Verwendung mit Intel Mikroprozessoren bestimmt. Bestimmte, nicht für die Intel-Mikroarchitektur spezifische Optimierungen sind für Intel® Mikroprozessoren reserviert. Entnehmen Sie weitere Informationen zu den spezifischen Befehlssätzen, die von dieser Mitteilung abgedeckt werden, den entsprechenden Benutzer- und Referenzhandbüchern. Revisionshinweis: 20110804

6

Die Funktionsmerkmale und Vorteile von Intel® Techniken hängen von der Systemkonfiguration ab und können geeignete, Hardware, Software oder die Aktivierung von Diensten erfordern. Die Leistung kann je nach verwendeter Systemkonfiguration unterschiedlich ausfallen. Kein Computersystem bietet absolute Sicherheit. Informieren Sie sich beim Softwareanbieter, Systemhersteller, Fachhändler oder auf intel.com unter http://www.intel.com/software/tsx.

7

SPEC* sowie die Benchmark-Bezeichnungen SPECint*, SPECfp*, SPECjbb*, SPECjEnterprise*, SPECvirt_sc*, SPECpower_ssj*, SPECompM* und SPECompL* sind Marken der Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.

8

TPC Benchmark, TPC-C, tpmC, TPC-H, QphH, TPC-E und tpsE sind Marken des Transaction Processing Council. Weitere Informationen siehe www.tpc.org.

9

SAP und SAP NetWeaver sind Marken der SAP AG in Deutschland und anderen Ländern. Weitere Informationen finden Sie unter http://www.sap.com/benchmark.

10

VMware und VMmark sind Marken von VMware, Inc.

11

Intel® Prozessoren mit derselben Artikelbezeichnung (gleiches Modell) können aufgrund natürlicher Schwankungen im Fertigungsprozess Unterschiede in der Taktfrequenz und der Leistungsaufnahme aufweisen.